I have nothing against wine and liquor stores working with wholesalers on what to stock on their shelves. I encourage it! The wholesalers give these stores, and consumers, the best bang for their buck. They will open the doors to new and exciting choices, from established wineries and will continue to stock the old favorites, so you know you can pick up your favorite bottle. But what about the consumer in a small town with limited access?
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEisuwJNQFHjBev6A0w1L6PQptaRrq85l3cVKEs3enofE6EkHUZ8ZQZFvZ3iesCjjCgMsJkST2NzA2nGgxoJ3aojNgPAJ-yfO1ZVzjbQNQk1korFC7fsSL-J2CjFn5bwWa8A6HZU4JnSx6M/s1600/our_dog_blue(web).jpg)
But (of course there is a but), since leaving Virginia, I haven't had a single Virginian wine. Simply because it isn't cost effective for retail stores to work with the smaller wineries to keep bottles on the shelves. They need wine that is going to move! And I understand. I get it, really. But why should this prevent me from ordering my choices directly from the winery? I'm willing to pay a little extra to Chateau Morrisette in order to enjoy a bottle (or 2) of Our Dog Blue a couple of times a year. This is a win-win-win: I get the wine I want, the winery has a couple more sales each year and SD brings in some revenue.
The current compromise would require wineries to register with the state and pay some of the taxes that wholesalers currently pay. More details are in the Argus Leader story.
I'm hopeful the state will be able to come up with a compromise. This seems to be a good compromise from this consumers point of view. Of course, I guess I could attempt to get a job as a wholesaler and get my choices into the stores that way (anyone know how I go about applying?)
No comments:
Post a Comment